Delimitation after 2026: representation cannot punish successful population policy
- The political debate concerns a fresh delimitation after the constitutional freeze based on the 1971 Census ends with the first Census conducted after 2026.
- One proposal would extend the freeze for 25 years while increasing Lok Sabha seats by the same percentage for every State.
- Another demand is that the constitutional legislation itself specify each State's seat allocation instead of leaving the decisive distribution opaque.
- The issue is tied to implementation of women's reservation, because the 2023 constitutional framework links commencement to delimitation after the relevant Census.
- Population-based representation supports political equality: broadly, each representative should serve a comparable number of people.
- States that reduced fertility fear losing relative influence to States with faster population growth.
- A permanent freeze would create large differences in constituency population; immediate proportional redistribution could weaken cooperative federalism.
- Lok Sabha representation, Rajya Sabha federal balance, Finance Commission transfers and fiscal incentives must not be conflated.
- Increase the total size of the Lok Sabha so under-represented populations gain seats without imposing large absolute losses on other States.
- Use a transparent formula, transition period and an all-party or inter-State consultation mechanism.
- Protect SC/ST reservation and operationalise women's representation without indefinite delay.
- Publish projections using Census data before Parliament votes on the final allocation.
- Revise Articles 81, 82, 170 and 327; the 42nd, 84th and 87th Amendments; Delimitation Commission; and the 106th Amendment on women's reservation.