Special Intensive Revision: electoral-roll cleansing cannot become mass disenfranchisement
- More than 1.5 crore names have been deleted in the third phase of the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision across 16 States and three Union Territories.
- Draft data for 12 States show 1.58 crore deletions, about 11.51% of the existing voters; Andhra Pradesh recorded the highest absolute deletion at 44.89 lakh, followed by Jharkhand, Haryana and Odisha.
- The stated categories include voters who shifted, died or appeared at multiple places. Claims, objections and new registrations remain possible before final rolls.
- High deletion proportions in Union Territories and frontier or migrant-heavy States make verification quality more important than the headline number alone.
- Article 326 guarantees adult suffrage, but an electoral roll must be accurate, inclusive, transparent and appealable.
- Door-to-door verification can remove genuine ineligible entries, yet tenants, migrants, women who change address, homeless citizens and conflict-affected communities face higher exclusion risk.
- Every deletion should have a recorded ground, notice, an accessible hearing and a time-bound restoration route before an election.
- Publish anonymised State-wise data on deletions, claims accepted, claims rejected and restorations.
- Audit unusual deletion clusters by booth, official, application source or address.
- Use interoperable death and migration records only with purpose limitation and human verification.
- Revise Article 326, Representation of the People Act 1950, Registration of Electors Rules 1960 and the ECI's supervisory role.