Statutory Baseline
Section 29A RPA 1951 vs Section 12 IT Act: Any association of 100 Indian electors can register as a political party under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Once registered, Section 12 of the Income Tax Act grants 100% tax exemptions on voluntary contributions, creating fertile incentives for shell political formations.
An explosive financial investigation revealing that six Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) operating from single-room offices in Gujarat accumulated over ₹1,700 crore in voluntary donations during FY24 has thrust the regulatory vacuum of political finance into sharp focus. Despite amassing massive campaign chests, none of these entities fielded candidates in the 2024 General Elections, effectively transforming political parties into conduits for round-tripping and commercial money laundering.
The institutional crisis stems from a critical statutory void: while Section 29A of the RPA empowers the Election Commission of India (ECI) to register political associations, the statute contains no parallel provision empowering the ECI to de-register them. In the landmark judgment Indian National Congress v. Institute of Social Welfare (2002), the Supreme Court ruled that the ECI lacks inherent powers to revoke political party registrations, restricting de-registration strictly to cases where registration was obtained through fraud, or where the party ceases to uphold allegiance to the Constitution.
Reforms Recommended by Law Commission & ECI
- Statutory De-registration Powers: Amend Section 29A of RPA 1951 to grant the ECI explicit authority to de-register parties that fail to contest elections for ten consecutive years.
- 1% Vote Share Threshold: Tie Section 12 Income Tax exemptions to achieving at least 1% of total votes polled in the latest parliamentary or legislative assembly election.
- Mandatory CAG-Empanelled Audits: Enforce third-party financial audits for all donation accounts exceeding ₹20,000 under Section 29C.
| Feature |
Recognised Political Parties |
Registered Unrecognised Parties (RUPPs) |
| Symbol Entitlement |
Exclusive reserved symbol nationwide / statewide |
Allotment from free symbols pool on election-to-election basis |
| Tax Exemption |
100% tax exemption under Section 12 IT Act |
Identical 100% tax exemption regardless of electoral participation |
| Public Broadcast |
Free airtime on Doordarshan & All India Radio |
No statutory entitlement to public broadcasting airtime |
Prelims Trap & Core Concept
UPSC Trap: Does the Election Commission of India have the statutory power to de-register political parties under the RPA, 1951? No. While the ECI can derecognise a national or state party under the Election Symbols Order 1968, it possesses no general power to de-register a political party under Section 29A without constitutional court intervention or legislative amendment.
Diplomatic Baseline
Strategic Risk Management vs Realignment: India's engagement with China within BRICS constitutes strategic risk mitigation rather than ideological rapprochement. Following the October 2024 Kazan disengagement pact, India balances continental border tranquility with maritime deterrence under the Quad.
The convening of the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi, highlighted by Chinese President Xi Jinping’s first official visit to India since the 2019 Mamallapuram informal summit, marks a critical inflection point in Asian geopolitics. The summit solidifies the fragile military disengagement established at the October 2024 Kazan Summit, shifting bilateral relations from open confrontation to structured competitive coexistence.
For New Delhi, hosting BRICS+ (now expanded to encompass Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt, and Ethiopia) demonstrates India’s non-aligned diplomatic autonomy. By championing the interests of the Global South within plurilateral frameworks while maintaining vital security partnerships with the West (Quad, I2U2), India positions itself as an indispensable bridge between divergent global architectures.
Core Economic Agendas of BRICS+
- Project mBridge & Multi-CBDC: Developing decentralized cross-border payment platforms to settle trade without transiting Western SWIFT networks.
- Local Currency Trade Settlements: Expanding bilateral currency settlement mechanisms to reduce vulnerability to dollar liquidity squeezes and secondary sanctions.
- New Development Bank (NDB) Expansion: Deploying non-conditional development loans for green infrastructure across emerging economies.
| Pillar |
G7 Coalition |
BRICS+ Framework |
| Demographic Weight |
~10% of global population |
~45% of global population |
| Economic Share (PPP) |
~30% of global GDP (PPP) |
~37% of global GDP (PPP) |
| Governance Model |
Western-dominated Bretton Woods consensus |
Consensus-driven, equal voting in NDB without vetoes |
Prelims Trap & Core Concept
UPSC Trap: In the New Development Bank (NDB), do founding members possess weighted voting power based on capital share like the World Bank? No. Under the 2014 Fortaleza Agreement, each of the five original BRICS members was allocated an equal voting share of 20%, and no single member possesses veto power.
Public Health Jurisprudence
Article 21 & Right to Safe Food: The Supreme Court has repeatedly expanded Article 21 to encompass the right to health and safe nutrition. Reading Article 21 alongside Article 47 (Directive Principle obligating the State to raise nutrition levels), regulatory bodies bear an affirmative duty to inform consumers of nutritional hazards.
In a critical public health hearing, the Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to explain its decade-long delay in mandating Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling (FOPNL). Public health advocates argue that voluntary industry scoring systems, such as Health Star Ratings (HSR), obscure high concentrations of unhealthy fats, sodium, and sugars under aggregated algorithms.
In contrast, independent scientific bodies, including the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), advocate for mandatory interpretive warning labels (Red Hexagonal Badges). Under this model, any product exceeding strict cut-offs for added sugar, saturated fat, or sodium must display an explicit warning, enabling immediate comprehension regardless of consumer literacy.
ICMR-NIN 2024 Dietary Guidelines Benchmarks
- Ultra-Processed Food (UPF) Hazard: UPFs contribute significantly to non-communicable diseases (diabetes, cardiovascular disease) responsible for 66% of adult mortality in India.
- Protein Intake Realities: ICMR-NIN establishes 0.83 g/kg body weight as sufficient for healthy adults, warning against commercially marketed synthetic protein powders containing hidden sugars.
- Sugar Caloric Limit: Recommends restricting added refined sugars to less than 5% of daily total caloric intake.
| Parameter |
Health Star Rating (Industry Preferred) |
Warning Labels (ICMR-NIN Preferred) |
| Scoring Logic |
Aggregated score allowing positive nutrients to mask excess sugars |
Independent threshold for each hazardous nutrient (Sugar/Salt/Fat) |
| Cognitive Speed |
Requires calculation and comparison across packaging |
Instant visual recognition in <3 seconds |
| Global Precedent |
Australia, New Zealand (voluntary) |
Chile, Mexico, Brazil (mandatory warning laws) |
Prelims Trap & Core Concept
UPSC Trap: Is FSSAI established under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019? No. FSSAI is a statutory autonomous authority established under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, functioning under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
Agronomic & Legal Baseline
Section 39 PPV&FR Act, 2001: Grants Indian farmers an inviolable right to save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share, or sell farm-saved seeds, provided that such seeds are not sold under a commercial brand name or trademark belonging to a registered breeder.
The Union Ministry of Agriculture has initiated nationwide consultations on the Draft Seeds Bill 2026, seeking to overhaul the obsolete Seeds Act of 1966. The legacy 1966 statute governed only "notified varieties", leaving more than 70% of commercial seeds in India unregulated. This regulatory void allowed spurious and low-germination seeds to cause recurring agrarian crises and severe farmer debt distress.
The 2026 draft introduces mandatory registration of all commercial seed varieties and implements end-to-end QR code tracking via the SATHI (Seed Traceability, Authentication and Holistic Inventory) portal. However, farmer unions and agricultural economists warn that overly broad seed certification requirements could inadvertently criminalize traditional community seed-saving and informal barter networks.
Key Provisions of Draft Seeds Bill 2026
- Mandatory Varietal Registration: Every seed variety sold commercially must be registered with the Central Seed Committee to verify minimum germination and purity.
- Stringent Penalties for Spurious Seeds: Imposes fines up to ₹5 lakh and imprisonment for fraudulent marketing of substandard seeds.
- Farmer Exemption Safeguards: Must explicitly affirm farmers' customary rights under Section 39 of PPV&FR Act, 2001 to prevent intellectual property overreach.
| Feature |
Seeds Act, 1966 |
Draft Seeds Bill, 2026 |
| Registration Scope |
Only notified varieties regulated (~30% market) |
Mandatory registration of all commercial varieties (100%) |
| Digital Traceability |
Absent (paper certification tags) |
QR-code tracking from breeder to farmer via SATHI |
| Spurious Seed Penalties |
Nominal fines (₹500 to ₹1,000) |
Strict criminal liabilities, cancellation of license, compensation |
Prelims Trap & Core Concept
UPSC Trap: Can an Indian farmer sell seeds of a protected variety under the PPV&FR Act, 2001? Yes, conditionally. Under Section 39(1)(iv), a farmer is fully entitled to sell seeds of a protected variety, provided they are not packaged and sold under the registered brand name or trademark of the breeder.
Central Banking Mechanics
FCNR(B) Currency Swaps: A central bank liquidity operation where commercial banks raise foreign currency non-resident deposits (USD) and swap them with the RBI for Rupees. The RBI absorbs the exchange risk on the principal repayment, deploying the received dollars into sovereign foreign reserves.
Amid elevated crude oil import bills ($102/barrel) and heightened global financial tightening, the Reserve Bank of India successfully mobilised $127 billion through its special FCNR(B) dollar swap window, pushing India's gross foreign exchange reserves beyond the historic $700-billion threshold (providing nearly 11 months of import cover).
While the swap insulated the Rupee from speculative depreciation, macroprudential analysts have flagged an emerging asymmetry: under the facility, the RBI provides exchange rate coverage strictly for the deposit principal. Commercial banks remain responsible for servicing future dollar interest liabilities, with over 65% of commercial banks leaving interest rate and forward currency hedges unpurchased to maximize short-term net interest margins.
Structure of the RBI Swap Operation
- Dollar Inflow: Commercial banks mobilise 3- to 5-year USD deposits from Non-Resident Indians at attractive spreads.
- Buy/Sell Swap with RBI: Banks sell dollars to the RBI in exchange for Rupees at current spot rates, simultaneously entering forward contracts to repurchase dollars at maturity at subsidized forward premia (~3.5%).
- Yield Arbitrage: RBI earns yields by investing dollars into US Treasury securities (~4.25%), offsetting forward contract underwriting costs.
| Account Type |
Currency of Maintenance |
Exchange Risk Bearer |
Indian Tax Status |
| FCNR(B) |
Foreign Currency (USD, GBP, EUR, JPY) |
Bank bears exchange risk |
Tax-free interest in India |
| NRE |
Indian Rupee (INR) |
Depositor bears exchange risk |
Tax-free interest in India |
| NRO |
Indian Rupee (INR) |
Depositor bears exchange risk |
Subject to TDS (taxable in India) |
Prelims Trap & Core Concept
UPSC Trap: Can FCNR(B) deposits be maintained in Indian Rupees, and who bears the foreign exchange risk? FCNR(B) deposits are maintained strictly in designated foreign currencies (USD, GBP, EUR, JPY), and the commercial bank bears the exchange risk, unlike NRE accounts which are maintained in INR.